A Friday afternoon question

Last Friday I sat in supervision with my coaching supervisor, one of the most experienced and respected coaches I know. We were meant to be reflecting on my practice, as we usually do. Instead, the conversation kept returning to one subject that simply would not let go.

Artificial intelligence.

What might it mean for coaching? What might it mean for coaches? The questions came from a thoughtful place, but beneath them sat a genuine concern. If a machine can hold a conversation, remember everything you have ever shared with it, and respond instantly, tirelessly, and with the appearance of warmth and empathy, then what, exactly, remains for the human coach?

It is a fair question, and it deserves something better than reassurance.

The weaker argument, and the stronger one

My first instinct was to describe what coaches actually do. We notice the slight change in someone’s voice as they approach what really matters, the sentence that is never quite finished, the thread connecting something mentioned casually at the start of a session with something that surfaces half an hour later, the quiet tension between what someone says and what their body has been saying all along. Much of coaching lives beneath the words.

All of that is true. Yet, as I discussed back in September 2023, this is the weaker argument.

Listing the things AI supposedly cannot do is a fragile place to build your case. Every capability you point to is another capability the industry is trying to reproduce, and if you build your identity around today’s limitation you quietly give yourself an expiry date.

The stronger argument does not depend on what AI can or cannot do. The power of coaching was never simply in its capabilities. It is in the profoundly ordinary fact that one human being is genuinely met by another. To be witnessed by someone who can be changed by your story, who carries their own imperfections, their own history and mortality, is fundamentally different from being processed by a system, however convincing its simulation of care may become.

Presence was never just another coaching skill. It is the thing itself.

And that was where the conversation turned. If a world saturated with artificial intelligence does not diminish the value of human presence, then it increases it. The more of life becomes mediated through machines, the more valuable genuine human connection becomes. Being explicitly human may become one of the rarest resources we possess.

Being human on purpose

That phrase stayed with me long after the supervision ended.

Explicitly human. Being human on purpose. Not as the thing left over once the machine has reached its limits, but as a deliberate practice in its own right.

Because I think there is a danger hiding here, and it is not the one we usually name. The danger is not that AI takes our humanity from us. It is that we quietly stop exercising it ourselves.

Connection is a muscle. Attention is a muscle. The ability to stay with another person, to notice, to listen beyond the obvious, to remain curious when certainty would be easier: these are not fixed characteristics. They strengthen through use and they weaken through neglect. The very capacities that make someone an exceptional coach may also be the capacities most at risk in an increasingly automated world, and therefore the ones most worth cultivating.

That is what this series is about. Not being human by default. Being human by design.

More than coaching

I have watched, more times than I can count, someone hear themselves say the thing they had been circling for months, simply because another person was paying close enough attention for it to surface. No clever prompt produced it. Presence did.

And the more I sat with that, the more I realised the argument does not stop at coaching. Coaching is simply where these capacities are most concentrated, and where I happen to see them most clearly, which is why it is where this series begins. But presence, judgement, the perception of what is not being said, the ability to draw the best out of another person, none of these belong to coaches alone. They are what make a thoughtful leader and a clear-eyed architect, a teacher who changes a life and a clinician who treats a person rather than a chart, a parent who truly listens and a partner who stays curious, an artist who notices what the rest of us walked straight past.

Everywhere AI strips away the mechanical and the routine, the same residue is left behind. The human. And the human becomes the difference.

So this is not really a series about coaching. It is a series about the deliberate cultivation of the capacities that become more valuable precisely because AI exists. Coaching is the first lens. Leadership, architecture, education, healthcare, creativity, parenting and the relationships that hold our lives together are others I want to turn the same idea upon.

The other side of Human Intent

Readers who have followed my recent writing will recognise that this grows from the same roots as Human Intent and Intent-Driven Development. There I have argued that, as AI becomes more capable, our role shifts from execution towards intention: we decide what matters, and machines increasingly help us achieve it. That work looks towards the technology.

This series turns the lens back towards us. If our greatest contribution becomes the quality of our judgement, our intent and our wisdom, then one question follows naturally. How do we become the kinds of people capable of exercising those things well?

It is the same conversation viewed from the opposite direction. One asks how we build systems worthy of our intentions. The other asks how we become people worthy of shaping them. And both range across the same territory, because the places that most need our intent, our organisations, our craft, our homes and our care for one another, are exactly the places that need us at our most human.

Why this matters

Strip everything else away and the argument becomes remarkably simple. If the future increasingly depends on Human Intent, then it depends on the quality of the humans producing that intent. Our judgement. Our self-awareness. Our curiosity. Our courage. Our capacity to understand one another. These stop being pleasant qualities and become decisive ones.

That is why the deliberate work of becoming more human matters now in a way it never quite had to before. Not because AI cannot do these things, but because the world will increasingly need people who know how to do them well, and disciplines, coaching among them, that help us get there.

That, ultimately, was where my supervisor and I arrived on a Friday afternoon. Not coaching defended against artificial intelligence. Coaching, and a great deal else besides, made more valuable because of it.

So this is the beginning. Over the coming months I want to explore what it really means to be Explicitly Human in an age increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence, across the many parts of life where that question turns out to matter.

Because the future was never going to be human or machine. It was always going to be about the quality of the humans choosing how the machines are used.

And perhaps the most important decision we make will not be what we teach the machines. It will be what we continue teaching ourselves.

Next Article ->